<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.diyplanner.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>D*I*Y Planner - Is ther a laser printer able to print/duplex using thin paper? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Is ther a laser printer able to print/duplex using thin paper?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Impact printer</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-385564</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In case you can&#039;t convince the bureacracy to change its ways and forms...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve done a bit of research and if you want to keep using the carbon paper the printer you&#039;re looking for is an &quot;impact printer&quot;. They&#039;re a more modern version of the dot matrix with a slightly different mechanism.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alternatively, if you want something to print on very fragile paper you&#039;ll need a small Plan Printer (they&#039;re used by engineers and artists).&lt;br /&gt;
The one I&#039;ve seen was a few years old. It looked like a picture frame with a cross bar that moved up and down the frame. You put a sheet of paper on a tray, put the frame on top of the tray. When you print the bar with the printer head moves up and down over the paper, with the printer head moving from side to side. So the paper remains flat all the time with the printer just touching it where it needs to add ink.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:36:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katrina</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 385564 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Last idea.</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-385514</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have one last idea for you. Ask the people who are forcing you to use the forms what they&#039;d do in your shoes. Ask if any of their other business associates have found a way to print on the pesky things. Ask if they&#039;d consider changing their forms. All you can do is ask, and the worst they can do is say no, look dumb, plead ignorance, or cry shame on you for asking. None of that is fatal, so why not try it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;shris&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:07:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>shris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 385514 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>to all who replied</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-385483</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Guys, thanks again for all suggestions and attention to the archaic practices of printing on both sides of multipart forms.  yes, it is ridiculous, and perhaps is designed to be such for reasons of inhibiting commerce.  yes, these are old government forms that cannot be tractor fed (or at least they dont have the perforated strips on either left or right side.  Switch box would select the correct printer, but still the printer cannot print these forms properly, so would have to either manually load them or find an inkjet/laser that can either feed each piece of the ultra light (onion skin) part of the multipart form or all of them together, both of which result in jams.  unfortunately cant do much about the forms - cant pick different ones; any kind of watermarking using software could be considered forgery.  yes, some dot matrix printers run off usb, mine is networked :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks for all your help, feel free to write if there is anything new, but looks like we&#039;ve picked everyone&#039;s brains...  :(&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:05:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 385483 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Many do, according to Google</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-377735</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I was curious, too.&lt;br /&gt;
The nicer ones have serial, parallel, and USB.&lt;br /&gt;
-----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;I think the surest sign that there is intelligent life out there in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.&quot; (Calvin and Hobbes/Bill Waterson)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:21:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ygor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 377735 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>curious if....</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-377715</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m curious if any run off of USB, or if they are all the old parallel kind. Of course, I&#039;m curious, but not curious enough to actually go and look for myself. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Jon&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:15:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jonglass</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 377715 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Multiparts on both sides???</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-377688</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can&#039;t say as I&#039;ve ever seen a multipage form that requires each sheet to have stuff on both sides. I&#039;ve only ever seen multipart forms that had the carbon *included* in the paper, or bound within the stack. To have a bunch of sheets bound without any carbon, yet require them to be filled out identically, sounds amazingly weird.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m gonna guess you&#039;re filling these things out for a vendor or customer. Within a single company people would never stand for such inefficiency. :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is that thin onion-skin paper, right?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wild. Why would anyone make forms like that, rather than just a two page multipart with carbon?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good luck, man. That form was designed without machinery in mind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;shris&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:27:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>shris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 377688 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>There are lots on Google Shopping</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-377620</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;and quite a few look like new stuff as opposed to old, used hardware.  Apparently, the dot matrix printer is not dead yet.&lt;br /&gt;
-----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;I think the surest sign that there is intelligent life out there in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.&quot; (Calvin and Hobbes/Bill Waterson)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:38:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ygor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 377620 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I&#039;m actually surprised</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-377557</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By how many dot-matrix printers are still around. Especially in medical/dental offices. Some have gone to laser, but for patient charts, etc., I still hear the dot.dot.dot.dot. zzzzzzzzzzzz of the old dot matrix printers all the time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:55:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ap1994</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 377557 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Printing on forms</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-377544</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It sounds like the form you&#039;re using is an old official government form or some type of invoicing/shares form etc that&#039;s made to be written on by hand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As was mentioned above, you need impact like a key or a mechanical print head to work on carbon paper.&lt;br /&gt;
So, if you have to use those forms, my suggestions are&lt;br /&gt;
- stick to dot matrix&lt;br /&gt;
or&lt;br /&gt;
- investigate if you can find an electric/electronic typewriter that will hook up to your computer. It may be easier to load than the dot matrix&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alternatively, if you only have to produce the paperwork and the only limitation is that it be individually numbered (that is the specific forms are optional so long as the numbering is unique)&lt;br /&gt;
- investigate some cheap software options for unique numbering of papers/files&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:17:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katrina</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 377544 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I agree with Jon</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-377531</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It also seems to me that you are trying to accomodate an out-dated paperwork method.  If you cannot get a reliable printer that can handle the forms, I would recommend you re-think the forms to something that standard printers can handle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Numbering, watermarking and such can be done with software.&lt;br /&gt;
-----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;I think the surest sign that there is intelligent life out there in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.&quot; (Calvin and Hobbes/Bill Waterson)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:42:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ygor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 377531 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>multipart</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-377450</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Mark-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you saying that these multipart forms are not made for tractor-feed impact printers? If not, what are they made for? Or, is the problem that you want to print one form at a time, and not keep them fed via the tractor-feed? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems to me that if you have more than one form, that probably it would be in your interests, and cheaper than all the other options, to simply have multiple printers, and connect them via a switch box. So, to the computer, they would be &quot;one&quot; printer, but you choose what printer at the switch box before you print. That way, you aren&#039;t swapping out forms, and creating extra work for yourself, and you aren&#039;t spending boucoups of money on a specialty laser--you&#039;ll be saving money over something like that, and still have your flexibility--so saying that these forms are tractor-feed forms.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:26:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jonglass</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 377450 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>comments...</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-377123</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Guys/Gals, thank you much for your suggestions, explanations, options, etc.  The reason using dot matrix is cumbersome is because one either has to manually feed these multipart forms or use a cut sheet feeder which kills about a quarter of forms.  Secondly, since forms are intended to have text on both sides, we run the forms through printer backwards after putting carbon paper between each sheet.  This is too cumbersome, inefficient and time consuming, so was/am looking for a laser/inkjet w duplexer and if possible finisher solution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Search google up and down, gone through forums, even registered for several.  Can only come up with commercial printing companies who sell industrial size machines which take up more space than the office i have. :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately i cannot use any other paper as the pages of the multipart form are watermarked and are unique - have serial numbers, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will talk to a local print shop. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Love the colator idea given that there is a laser printer that can handle thin light paper...  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;will look in to offset press, however it sounds like a major investment and more burden$ome than a small business can afford, plus the docs i print differ each time, so couldnt print the same one over and over...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your answers, if anyone has any other ideas would much appreciate hearing from you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Mark&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:24:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>the guy who asked original question</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 377123 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Very Pricey</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-375079</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A great idea, but to your wallet&#039;s disadvantage.  All you are getting is collated colored paper.  Color laser paper can be had for less than $10 a ream.  All you need after that is either cheap labor to collate it or a gadget like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.a14electronics.com/product-p/marcl6.htm&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; -- Google shopping shows it available for under $50&lt;br /&gt;
-----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;I think the surest sign that there is intelligent life out there in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.&quot; (Calvin and Hobbes/Bill Waterson)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:08:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ygor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 375079 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If you have the entire form</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-375078</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If you have the entire form electronically, so that you can print any lines or other decorations aside from the actual form data, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.graytex.com/colored-laser-paper.htm&quot;&gt;this kind of paper&lt;/a&gt; will help you fake multi-part forms. But then again, so could any colored paper, I expect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many other options may be found that might work: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=laser+multi-part&quot;&gt;starter Google search&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:04:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mwr</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 375078 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Use the proper tool for the job</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comment-375065</link>
 <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;the pages are parts of the multipart form that is designed to be fed into a dot matrix impact printer, then carbon copy added, the page reversed and reprinted&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OK, then either use a dot matrix impact printer -- if them thangs are still made -- or go to proper laser printer compatible paper and print as many copies as necessary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are doing the equivalent of using a butter knofe as s screwdriver.  You may get it to work, but it is usually a lot of trouble.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there any reason you cannot just print multiple copies ?&lt;br /&gt;
-----------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;I think the surest sign that there is intelligent life out there in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.&quot; (Calvin and Hobbes/Bill Waterson)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:01:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ygor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 375065 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is ther a laser printer able to print/duplex using thin paper?</title>
 <link>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;LISTED QUESTION BELOW.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.diyplanner.com/node/6158#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.diyplanner.com/taxonomy/term/12">Going Analog</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:04:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>printer_question</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6158 at http://www.diyplanner.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

